113
Print of Report dated 5 April 1902 (in 5658/03)
experience of that Fund, and the great difficulty of dealing satisfactorily with so small an institution had previously been emphasized in Mr. Young's Report on the Valuation of the Fund as it existed on the 31st of December 1900.
10. That valuation, which was of course based on the old Pension Tables, after making allowance as far as possible for the peculiar character of the experience of the Fund, showed that the gross liabilities of the Fund then amounted to $252,337 and the surplus to $10,275.54, or that the surplus was between 4 and 5% of the liabilities. In the case of the valuation of the Straits Settlements Fund (also as on the 31st of December 1900) the surplus disclosed was a little under 10% of the gross liabilities (the same pension Tables being used) so that the Straits Fund was found to be in a rather better position than the Hongkong Fund. But as I have
stated
113
IPrint of Report "dated 5 April 1902
in 5658/03)
experience of that Fund, and the great diffi-
culty of dealing satisfactorily with so small
an institution had previously been emphasized in
Mr. Young's Report on the Valuation of the
Fund as it existed on the 31st of December
1900.
10. That valuation, which was of course
based on the old Pension Tables, after making
allowance as far as possible for the peculiar
character of the experience of the Fund,
showed that the gross liabilities of the
Fund then amounted to $252,337 and the surplus
to $10,275.54, or that the surplus was between
4 and 5% of the liabilities. In the case
of the valuation of the Straits Settlements
Fund (alsc us on the 31st of December 1900)
the surplus disclused was a little under 10%
of the gross liabilities (the same pension
Tables being used) so that the Straits Fund
was found to be in a rather better position
than the Hongkong Fund. But as I have
st at ed
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.